![]() ![]() I’d personally lean towards and AC Wave 2 model such as the AC-HD or the (not tested) NanoHD. If you don’t have many Wi-Fi 6 clients, don’t have an Internet connection over 400 Mbps, or just can’t find any U6 models in stock - there are many Wi-Fi 5 models that are still available and still good access points to buy. While the Wi-Fi 6 models have the most top end speed, some of the Wi-Fi 5 models are not far behind. Unfortunately they are not always easy to find in stock, and even harder to find at MSRP. Unless you need something outdoor rated or one of the unique form factors, the U6-Lite, U6-LR, and U6-Pro have the most performance per dollar. ![]() If you’re looking for a UniFi AP, any of the Wi-Fi 6 models are the obvious first choices. I don’t have a reliable way to test multi-client performance yet, but they should also offer the most performance in multi-client tests and realistic use. 5 GHz performance depends on a lot of factors, but the AC-HD, U6-LR and U6-Pro performed the best overall. The U6-Pro has the best 2.4 GHz performance, due to it being the only model tested with Wi-Fi 6 support. From the same location 2.4 GHz connections are stronger and more stable. These results show how the AP performs when it’s 5 GHz signal is hovering around -80 dBm RSSI and around 10 SNR. Wall material and quantity are usually more important than distance in a home or small business network. If there is clear line of sight AP range can extend much further, but every wall imposes a dBm penalty. When deciding on how many access points you need, a good general rule is don’t expect 5 GHz coverage to extend further than 2 walls or 30 feet away.Ģ.4 GHz signals extend this circle out a bit, but with a few walls in the way, getting low SNR links and slow performance is likely. 5 GHz signals attenuate faster, and are more affected by obstructions. #Unifi download speed test freeWith every foot of free space and every obstruction, a Wi-Fi signal attenuates and gets weaker. This test is more realistic, and the 15 feet + 1 wall results are more likely what you will see in typical use. ![]() All of the above tests were very close range, and were meant to show an absolute best-case scenario. I wanted to show the impact of distance from your AP on a typical 80 MHz-wide 5 GHz channel. The UDM, BeaconHD and U6-Pro also get a small additional boost due to their support for a 3rd spatial stream in 5 GHz.įor my next test, I switched back to my 2x2 Wi-Fi 6 client, and tested from 3 different places in my house. Thanks to 256-QAM and usually less interference, 5 GHz can deliver more data over a 20 MHz channel. Without a 3rd spatial stream, they all fall behind.įirst, let’s look at 20 MHz channels in both bands. The UDM, BeaconHD, and U6-Pro can on 5 GHz only.Īll the other APs (AC-Lite, AC-Mesh, AC-In-Wall, U6-Lite) only support 2 spatial streams, making them incapable of delivering the highest data rates. The AC-Pro, AC-Mesh-Pro, AC-HD, and U6-LR are all able to match the 3 spatial streams, 256-QAM, and up to 1300 Mbps data rates of my 3x3 client on both bands. This is a more even playing field, and a chance for the 3x3 and 4x4 APs to show their strength. This is an interesting test because it shows the impact of an additional spatial stream, and removes the highest-end modulation (1024-QAM) and longer symbol duration of Wi-Fi 6. #Unifi download speed test proNext, I switched over to my MacBook Pro and it’s 3 spatial stream Wi-Fi 5 radio. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |